Nathan Gonzalez Bio, Age, Books, Net Worth, The Huffington Post

Nathan Gonzalez Biography

Nathan Gonzalez is an Orange County, California-based American researcher, author, and journalist. He works as a Middle East analyst with the Foreign Policy in Focus think tank and is the founder of the website NationandState.org, which bills itself as a “open-source foreign policy think tank.” He is also a Huffington Post blogger.

How old is Nathan Gonzalez? – Age

He is 44 years old as of 2023. He was born in 1979 in Staten Island, New York.

Nathan Gonzalez Career

In 2002, he got an exploration prize from UCLA. His exploration “anticipated that a U.S. attack would achieve huge partisan difficulty, the unavoidable enemy of Patriotism in Iraq, and a more grounded Iran.” As per his life story on The Huffington Post, Gonzalez has dealt with a few political missions, as fellow benefactor and political overseer of Latinos for America, and in 2004 as a staff member on Lead representative Howard Dignitary’s official mission in Iowa and New Mexico. A new blog passage by Gonzalez, named “On Iraq and Iran, Obama Appears to Get It,” proposes a level of help for the international strategy of Majority rule official competitor Barack Obama.

As a rule, Gonzalez makes light of the gamble of Iranian atomic weapons. In a discourse before the World Undertakings Board of Sacramento, he said: “A great deal of hostile to Semitic cases that have been made by Iranian President Ahmadinejad terrify certain individuals. Justifiable… Yet we need to comprehend that Israel has an atomic obstacle and Israel sits on Muslim sacred place… no enthusiast will attempt to annihilate Jerusalem with atomic weapons. Surely no ‘fan’ from the Islamic Republic of Iran, who has a manor or possesses an extravagance townhouse and needs system survival…”

Gonzalez spreads out his case for discretionary commitment and standardization of relations with Iran through two ideas: Iran’s “direction of autonomy,” and the Iranian system’s “religion of against Patriotism.”

Nathan Gonzalez Photo
Nathan Gonzalez Photo

Gonzalez sees Iran’s cutting-edge famous developments, including the 1978-1979 Transformation, as a component of a two-dimensional pattern toward freedom from unfamiliar intercession from one viewpoint, and “autonomy from uncalled for rulers” on the other. As per Gonzalez, the peculiarity contains “generally the final remaining one and a half hundreds of years of Iranian current history. This direction has driven Iran to savagely let itself out of the shackles of unfamiliar mediation, and has put Iran nearer to local vote-based system than any country in the adjoining Middle Easterner world.” As per Gonzalez, the initial segment of the direction (looking for freedom from unfamiliar impact) has been accomplished, however to the detriment of the subsequent objective, that of freeing Iran of imperious rulers. He considers the direction a continuous peculiarity that will probably lead Iran toward more noteworthy opportunities, for however long it is unrestricted by outside powers.

As indicated by Gonzalez, Iran’s post-1979 articulations of hostile to Western opinion have been important for a “clique of hostile to Patriotism” that Ayatollah Khomeini set forth as “a system identifier, utilizing radicalism to tell his allies from his naysayers. Similar as being an individual from the Socialist Coalition in China, taking an enemy of American or supportive of religious government line in Iran has filled in as a calling card to show one’s faithfulness to Khomeini and the unrest.”

He proceeds to compose that the religion of hostile to Nationalism “keeps on filling in as an indication of system connection, rather a strict statement of the system’s international strategy.” Gonzalez composes that as opposed to the public authority’s way of talking, Iran “has one of the most U.S.- cordial populaces on the planet; positively the most supportive of American in the Muslim Center East.”

Nathan Gonzalez Books

His book, Engaging Iran: The Rise of a Middle East Powerhouse and America’s Strategic Choice, is influenced by the realism school of foreign policy. It implies that in the Middle East, a revamped Nixon Doctrine should be adopted. His book, as well as several of his blog comments, argue that Iran and the United States have many common interests, and that the United States should engage in active diplomacy with the Islamic Republic.